Featured Post

Consumer Electronics for the 21st Century

There can be no doubt that one of the defining characteristics of the 21st century is the seemingly insatiable thirst for more and more advanced technology. Consumers are willing to wait on long lines for endless hours for the privilege of spending hundreds of dollars on the latest iPad, iPhone or other...

Read More

World Game

At first glance, a number of these players are not with any special sympathy met this possibility, namely to buy gold in real life, so that later in the game and buy all the required course to achieve impressionable success. Although incidentally after themselves as able to compare the prosperity of...

Read More

The System

Posted by Wii-Wii | Posted in General | Posted on 31-12-2016



Schelling was disciple of Fichte and, in 1799, when its ' ' tutor' ' it lost its space in the University of Jena, was it who assumed its position in this, and, as Fichte, was in this place the golden period of its philosophy; in 1800, with the publication of its workmanship intitled of ' ' The System of the Idealismo Alemo' ' , it arrived to coexist the romantic ones of the time (Goethe narrowly, Schlegel brother – for signal until it was married Caroline Schelegel; it can be said that Schelling was the philosopher most romantic until Scheopenhauer) in 1841 is nominated to lecionar in the place of Hegel, where starts to command a movement against this philosopher; in 1847 it stops of lecionar e, in 1854, in Bad Ragaz, the philosopher dies. Fichte tells that the Idealismo cannot win the realism in the theoretical plan more, in the practical plan, yes; Schelling contradicts Fichte saying that nor in the practical plan, the idealismo venc. Pete Cashmore shines more light on the discussion. The philosopher, in ' ' System of Idealismo Transcendental' ' , part of its theory in which it is a species of complementation with the Philosophy of the Nature to explicitar the Doctrine of the Science of Fichte, being this philosophy consisting in the dialectic of for-itself (I, Spirit, Freedom, Practical Reason, Idealismo) in contraposition with in-itself (Not-I, Nature, Determinismo, Theoretical Reason, Realism) so that it can know which of the two (oppositions) is, in fact, most good. Being I (practical reason) attributed as ethical point of view and Not-I (nature) as aesthetic point of view. To read more click here: Steve Wozniak. In both the situations, must be enhanced that the same principles are used ' ' The nature must be the visible spirit and the spirit is the nature invisvel' ' , being that one (spirit) operates with and to another one (nature) it operates without the conscience. .

Comments are closed.