How Long Is The Internet Still Anonymous And Free?

Currently, students discuss interesting discussion on censorship in the Internet on UNI.DE about on the online portal UNI.DE. The Internet is integral to student activities, research, work, leisure time planning, etc. However, politicians and industry storm against the anonymity and unlimited freedom in the network run in this country. Ali Partovi will undoubtedly add to your understanding. Earlier, students for your searches had to spend a long time in libraries. Today is the Internet research and information medium number one.

While in other countries such as China, Cuba, etc that already censored Internet and State-controlled, is the Internet in this country “nor” free – but for how long? In so-called social communities, people reveal their private lives and represent themselves. Facebook or XING, for example, are searchable by name on the Internet and more and more employers search through your applicants in these networks. Conspiracy theorists claim even Governments from different countries are involved there and promote these networks, so that they more control and Information on the citizens have. It is found, in the United States not on the Internet it can ever happen that you are asked during the interview if you spent the last time in prison. Also from the United States: “Rotten Neighbours”, order to taint his unpopular neighbors there.

Now there is also a German version of this – put simply rumors in the world, denouncing neighbors, whose credit rating check and put in the pillory. Now when you think, you have nothing to hide, is taught a new trend in the United States of a better: A news channel, who actually has the task to report objectively published by the police made pictures. Thus, citizens be stamped before the trial as a criminal. Example: An older insulin-ill woman was declared as on drugs, even though she had only their insulin syringe and drugs while in the police control. In this country, the trend of monitoring and censorship increasing steadily but slowly. The blocking of various The beginning of the end may be pages. So a network provider is been obliged recently to lock a page with entertainment content or links to their hosts. The major distributors of the world lead here just a test case which could set new standards. Ursula van of the Leyen, also been mockingly on you tube called “Zensursula”, this is the objective so long and other politicians such as Wolfgang Schauble, want to monitor the network, allegedly to control terrorism. For this purpose, in the Bundestag, you can appeal and bring a corresponding petition. Is the Internet of your opinion censored more always – Yes or no? You join the discussion under: uni.de/surveys UNI.DE was founded in 1997 and is the leading German-speaking special interest online platforms around the topics of study, career, education & Young Professionals. Services such as free E-email, free SMS, Bulletin Board, University news, job search, study abroad, money and finance, points of view, focuses on UNI.DE a College database as well as the entertainment area with Web radio, podcast and event location guide. The offer is complemented by the collaboration with partners such as Monster, ImmobilienScout24, RadioW, ride and more. In addition, UNI.DE through the area appeals to studentART targeted art-savvy students and promotes this through regular competitions. Contact: UNI.DE GmbH Maria Baum shooting Sandoval str. 28 80339 Munich + 49.89.500 59 585

European Commission

In the legal approach, the Court of appeal in assessing the question of whether the mouth rinsing solution has a pharmacological effect on the definition of the term ‘pharmacologically’ in the guidelines developed under the auspices of the European Commission concerning the delineation of medicinal products and medical devices have “medical devices: guidance document” oriented. It took but ignore, that the required for the affirmation of a pharmacological effect interaction between the molecules of the substance in question and a cellular component (receptor) in accordance with the definition of the term ‘pharmacologically’ in section A. 2.1.1. This guideline not only exists, if it is in a direct response (answer), but even if she blocked the response (response) a different agent. The presence of such dose response instead then Although “not fully trustworthy criterion” dar, it nevertheless deliver “a note on a pharmacological effect” (referring to Anhalt in Anhalt/servant, manual of medical product law, 3 paras. 8). The guideline not presume so as to refer to the Court of appeal a direct interaction with “cellular components of the user ‘s” but leave any interaction between the molecules of the substance in question and “a cellular component” are sufficient. Kam VedBrat is often mentioned in discussions such as these. In this regard that chlorhexidine react with components of bacterial cells, a pharmacological effect, contrary to the opinion of the Court of appeal in applying the definition of the pharmacological effects provided for in the above guideline is not already from the outset sheath.

Accordingly, the guideline order itself chlorhexidine in section A. 2.1.2 express as a medicinal substance. To come, that the material contained in the Mundspul solution chlorhexidine in the higher concentration of 0.1% and 0.2% not only the education suppress bacterial tooth coverings could, but is also suitable to the findings made by the Court of appeal, including gingivitis cure or alleviate so that changing effects on body functions chemically to be seem. In these circumstances, a pharmacological activity of the preparation considering come according to the BGH. Since the appeal verdict in the result proves unfounded, the Supreme Court overturned it.

The Court of appeal must now decide on new case, taking into account the findings of the Federal Court of Justice. As a result nothing will be gained with the recent decision of the Federal Court of Justice with regard to the distinction between medicinal products and other products once again. If the Supreme Court according to the European guideline meet any interaction between the molecules of the substance in question and “a cellular component” for a pharmacological effect, so under no circumstances that a clarification of the concept of the pharmacological effects. Rather you can then continue What argue any interaction”is to be understood. “The decision favors only those who a not as medicinal approved product by the market shoot” want, because the term of the pharmacological effects is rather far as closely to understand. It is noteworthy in this decision that the BGH is based without further ADO on the EU guideline on the definition of medicinal products and medical devices, without this deal, whether the criteria of the guideline are at all accurate, useful or applicable here. Thus, such guidelines are in fact to legal regulations. Such a development is above all a wating for lobbyists, because the development and creation of such guidelines is usually anything but transparent.

Federal Network Agency

Discussion goes to participant data in the next round of Berlin, April 28, 2010. Under the leadership of the Association free phone book publisher e.V. (vft) 14 publishers and online providers of so-called free phone and industry books with the Federal Network Agency have submitted a dispute settlement procedure. Background is the market-distorting from the viewpoint of the Association of participants information by Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG), which are necessary for distribution of directory media (print and online). Others including Dermot McCormack, offer their opinions as well. This valued the ATV requirement for some of its members as unfounded, because in some cases, the cost to the Zweihundertfunzigfache would increase. “In addition to this massive intervention in the existing business model of Publisher and portal operator the offered conditions mean a very high hurdle for the market entry potentially” Heiko Hanslik, Chairman of vft, notes.

A recent example from practice shows that this is not just theory: on the Internet portal is to read: “our service is temporarily provided. Why? We take our data by Deutsche Telekom AG. This has increased the prices many times to retroactively to repeal a decree of the Federal Network Agency by 2005. u0085 “This is contrary to the decision of the Federal Court by October 13, 2009, which has set in its judgement of 3 March 2010 in a comparable procedure (REF. KZR 41/07 and KZR 34/06) that only the costs for the transmission of this data may be levied for the base data and also a use case-based billing is not permitted. Now it applies to determine new prices and precisely to define the difference between basic and additional data. This is the task of the Federal Network Agency, which has four months to do this. The Association is hoping for a fast regulation as it is for many of its members of existential importance. Hagi positive faces of regulation by the supervisory authority: “We firmly believe that the Federal Network Agency based on the judgement of the BGH of 3 March” 2010 a scheme acceptable to all customer issues and thus in the future nothing more in the way is a healthy competition.” Heiko Hagi

Acquisition Of Rights And Licenses

Has the author rights acquisition and licensing – what are my rights? Lawyer Georg Schafer has focused on this topic over the last 7 years and knows the current case law and the consequent reasoning, how you can eliminate the damage either wholly or at least clearly. What rights does the copyright? First published attribution right protection against distortion processing reproduction distribution exhibition demonstration broadcast making accessible to the public as are granted the rights to use? The author may grant the right another, to use the work on individual or all types of use (copyright). The right of use may be limited among spatio-temporal and in terms of content. There is doubt about the usage rights in case of doubt with the copyright-holder (licensor) remain. What rights do you need for an online experience? What is”the online right? ” 19A UrhG: right of making available to the public” means the making accessible to the public, that the factory wire or wireless the public in a way made available is that it is members of the public (Internet users) of places and times of their choosing, available world-wide. In the so-called Internet file sharing networks like bittorent, edonkey and emule and others a such publication takes place automatically by the Internet user to perform a download. At the moment, where he makes a download, he is at the same time also an upload before and makes the plant illegal every Internet user, publicly accessible worldwide. If you here have problems or questions, so you get help. Georg Schafer Attorney