Posted by Wii-Wii | Posted in General | Posted on 02-11-2016
Tags: internet, Web design
And then the author tried to convince me that it is best not to fool his head and ordered him to making the site 'for just $ 500!'. There are proposals to establish a network of sites for 2-2,5 thousand dollars. Cheapest I saw the offer for $ 100. So I had to think seriously about what is best – to order a site or try to do it yourself. I went through a lot of literature, has seen a lot of programs and finally selected the appropriate materials for experiments. So my dream of creating a site started implemented. Now I'm with my friends develop and create websites to order themselves.
We create websites with great programs, such as Drimviver, Saytkraft, Ucoz, etc. The latter is almost ready for the site – well-shalt template content and your site is ready! But personally, I like sites that are not tied to a variety of patterns and solid workpieces. Having made several sites in Ucoz, I gave up on that system and moved to Saytkraft. If you have not purchased this program, you can view it at: man who did not sign with programming languages, build a website be a few hours. Not unimportant Your decision to deploy a site – on a paid or free hosting service. If you decide to host your site on free hosting, you should know that the owner of the site you are in this case purely arbitrary, since hoster has the right to close your site at any time at its discretion – for the low attendance at the site for non-conformity of content – but who knows what else. In addition, the hoster will place on your site, advertising, which is not always the subject of a site.
Do not think that you gave someone free space on the Internet. If you choose paid hosting, you become the rightful owner of the site for a period of paid hosting. Often if you pay the hosting for a year is given a domain name for free. Sites commercial orientation, I recommend it paid hosting. Notify us of your decision to see samples of sites produced by Saytkraft program, click here: